© 2009 The Trustees of
Princeton University
609-258-5750
Search
Last Update Oct 18, 2008
 

Tom Espenshade

 
 

Diminished access to higher education is arguably one of the more significant predictors of inequality in our society. My research looks to understand who gets to attend selective colleges and universities, in an effort to discover how this process might promote social mobility or reinforce inequality. One of our projects tested the "frog pond" model of college admission decisions. Using data from more than 45,000 applications to three elite universities in the fall of 1997, we found that a given applicant's chances of being accepted are increased if the individual comes from a high school with relatively less talented students.In more recent studies, we find that the athlete admission "advantage" has been growing, while the underrepresented minority advantage has declined. At the same time, we find that preferences for athletes and legacies only mildly displace members of minority groups. The policy impact of such findings is significant. Ongoing attempts to eliminate affirmative action will substantially reduce the share of African Americans and Hispanics among admitted students. The Campus Life in America Student Survey (CLASS), a study of 12,000 freshmen and returning juniors, measures the prevalence and impact of diversity experiences in college. Relying on this data, my research team considers what college and university administrators can do to maximize the educational benefits of diversity.

Visit Website
 

Publications

The International Migration of the Highly Skilled

Although only the federal government is empowered to set immigration policy, the consequences are felt in states where international migrants are concentrated--pointing to the need to examine the implications of U.S. immigration at the subnational level. This book focuses on New Jersey as a high-immigration state whose immigrant population matches the race and ethnic composition of the U.S. population as a whole more closely than that of any other state, and whose immigration impacts have been relatively favorable. Its experience thus provides evidence of what it takes for a state to manage a relatively smooth transition into the economic, social, and political mainstream. Topics include wage and employment impacts, state and local fiscal impacts, public opinion toward immigrants, fertility, birth outcomes, education, political behaviors, homeownership, and undocumented immigration.
Investing in children

The first full length study comparing expenditures on raising children by parental income, education, mother's employment status, family size, region where the family lives, race, and the type of post secondary education a child receives. Valuable information for parenthood education programs in schools and indispensable to the judicial system in setting uniform guidelines for child support awards. Also valuable to states in drawing guidelines for reimbursing the foster care of children.