FACULTY RESEARCH  
Introductory Page
Matthew Botvinick
Jonathan Cohen
Ronald Comer
Andrew Conway
Joel Cooper
John Darley
Susan Fiske
Asif Ghazanfar
Joan Girgus
Adele Goldberg
Elizabeth Gould
Michael Graziano
Charles Gross
Uri Hasson
Bart Hoebel
Barry Jacobs
Philip Johnson-Laird
Sabine Kastner
Virginia Kwan
Yael Niv
Kenneth Norman
Daniel Oppenheimer
Daniel Osherson
Deborah Prentice
Emily Pronin
Eldar Shafir
Nicole Shelton
Stacey Sinclair
Susan Sugarman
Alexander Todorov
> Anne Treisman
      / Curriculum Vitae
      > Publications
      / Case Study

BOOK CHAPTERS
Treisman, A., & Davies, A., 1973. Divided attention to ear and eye. In S. Kornblum (Ed.) Attention and Performance IV, Academic Press, 101-117.
Treisman, A., Russell, R., & Green, J., 1975. Brief visual storage of shape and movement. In P.M.A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.) Attention and Performance V: Academic Press, London. 699-721.
Treisman, A., 1979. The psychological reality of levels of processing. In F. Craik & L. Cermak (Eds.) Levels of Processing and Human Memory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A., 1984. Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.) Varieties of Attention. New York: Academic Press, pp.29- 61.
Treisman, A., 1985. Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 31, 156-177, reprinted in Z. Pylyshyn (Ed.) Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective. Ablex: New Jersey, pp. 341-369.
Treisman, A., 1986. Properties, parts and objects. Chapter 35 in K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.) Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol. 2, Wiley, pp. 1-70.
Treisman, A., Cavanagh, P., Fischer, B., Ramachandran, V. and Van der Heydt, R., 1990. Form perception and attention: striate cortex and beyond. In Spillman, L., and Werner, J. (Eds.) Visual Perception: The Neurophysiological Foundations, New York: Academic Press.
Treisman, A. 1993. The perception of features and objects. In A. Baddeley and L. Weiskrantz (Eds.) Attention: Selection, awareness and control. A tribute to Donald Broadbent. Oxford: Clarendon Press University, pp. 5-35.
Treisman, A. & DeSchepper, B. 1996. Object tokens, attention, and visual memory. In T. Inui and J. McClelland (Eds.) Attention and Performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 15-46.
ARTICLES IN REFEREED JOURNALS
Oswald, I., Taylor, A. & Treisman, M., 1960. Discriminative responses to stimulation during human sleep. Brain, 83, 440-453.
Treisman, A., 1960. Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242-248.
Treisman, A., 1962. Binocular rivalry and stereoscopic depth perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 23-37.
Treisman, A., 1964. Selective attention in man. British Medical Bulletin, 20, 12-16.
Treisman, A., & Geffen, G. 1967. Selective attention: Perception or response? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 1-18.
Treisman, A., 1969. Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282- 299.
Treisman, A., & Fearnley, S., 1969. The Stroop Test: Selective attention to colors and words. Nature, 222, 437-439.
Treisman, A., & Riley, J., 1969. Is selective attention selective perception or selective response? A further test. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 27-34.
Treisman, A., & Squire, R., 1974. Listening to speech at two levels at once. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 82-97.
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G., 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H., 1982. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
Treisman, A., 1982. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 194-214.
Treisman, A., Kahneman,D., & Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.
Treisman, A., & Paterson, R., 1984. Emergent features, attention and object perception, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 12-21.
Treisman, A., 1986. Features and objects in visual processing, Scientific American, 254, No. 11, 114-125.
Treisman, A., & Gormican, S., 1988. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
Treisman, A., 1988. Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1988, 40A, (2) 201-237.
Musen, G. & Treisman, A., 1990. Implicit and explicit memory for visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 127-137.
Cavanagh, P., Arguin, M. and Treisman, A. 1990. Effects of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 479-491.
Treisman, A. & Sato, S., 1990. Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
Treisman, A., 1991. Search, similarity and the integration of features between and within dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 652-676.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. and Gibbs, B., 1992. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
Treisman, A., Vieira, A., & Hayes, A. 1992. Automaticity and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362.
Treisman, A. 1992. Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. American Psychologist, 47, 862-875.
Friedman-Hill, S.R., Robertson, L.C., & Treisman, A. 1995. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science, 269, 853-855
DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. 1996. Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 27- 47.
Treisman, A. 1996. The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178.

Top